Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 general score. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a little bit heavier than LG V50 ThinQ, it's a little thinner and also newer. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, giving you a couple nice extra features and performance improvements.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a bit better looking display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a much worse count of pixels in each display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has slightly more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a bit better battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.