Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than LG V50 ThinQ, with a score of 87.1 against 83.7. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is noticeably newer than the LG V50 ThinQ, it is a bit heavier and a little bit thicker. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little bit better screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and much less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.