Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aurora black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LTPS |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than Moto G 5G, with an 83.7 score against 81.5. These phones work with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features. LG V50 ThinQ is an older phone than the Moto G 5G, but it's thinner and lighter anyway. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little better performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto G 5G has superior battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Moto G 5G takes a bit better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto G 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.