Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora black | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, getting an 83.7 score against 82.6. LG V50 ThinQ is an older cellphone than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, but LG made it lighter and a bit thinner. The LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a higher pixels density.
LG V50 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Moto G 5G Plus shoots much better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a back camera with way more megapixels.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. Moto G 5G Plus features superior battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.