Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora black | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is much better than Moto G Power's overall score of 76.1. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than Moto G Power, even though it was released around 11 months before. These phones use Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Moto G Power has Android 11 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Power, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and more pixels per display inch. The LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G Power has superior battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a lot worse resolution camera and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
LG V50 ThinQ is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Power, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.