Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aurora black | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 general score. LG V50 ThinQ's design is lighter and a bit thinner than the Moto G Stylus (2021), although it was released around 21 months before. LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher screen density. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) captures a little bit better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a much better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
LG V50 ThinQ has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G Stylus (2021) has a battery duration that is very similar to LG V50 ThinQ's battery duration.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.