Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Aurora black | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, having an 86.2 score against 83.7. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G200 5G has the newer 11 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it provides some nice extra features and enhanced performance. Although Motorola Moto G200 5G is way newer than LG V50 ThinQ, it's just a little heavier and just a bit thicker.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto G200 5G has a little better processing power than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory. The Moto G200 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size. The Moto G200 5G has a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and videos in low-light situations and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.