Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora black | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is better than the Moto G7 Plus, getting a score of 83.7 against 76.1. LG V50 ThinQ is a just a little heavier cellphone than Moto G7 Plus, but they are equally thin. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit sharper screen than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a little larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a higher amount of pixels per display inch. LG V50 ThinQ takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a back camera with a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, and they both have a 0.38 inches back camera sensor, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G7 Plus, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ features longer battery performance than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.