Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Moto G84, with a global score of 83.7 against 80.9. Both devices we compare here use Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Moto G84 has Android 13. Moto G84 counts with a little bit better screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G84, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G84, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto G84 captures much clearer photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G84 also counts with a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Moto G84 has improved battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.