Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-10 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, with an 83.7 score against 75.8. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is incredibly newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger display, a bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a little better pixel count in each inch of display. The LG V50 ThinQ has a greater storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little faster CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more cpu cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ captures slightly better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower video quality and a much worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and video.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.