Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Aurora black | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 overall score. The LG V50 ThinQ design is newer, but noticeably heavier and notably thicker than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. The LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a larger display, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a greater pixels quantity per inch of display.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with greater battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. LG V50 ThinQ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a bigger diafragm aperture and faster video frame rate.
LG V50 ThinQ costs more than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.