Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than Moto Z3, having an 83.7 score against 77.6. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even being the best in this review, the LG V50 ThinQ construction is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Moto Z3.
LG V50 ThinQ has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a better pixel count in each inch of screen, a little larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG V50 ThinQ has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more internal storage.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have a camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution and the same video quality, the LG V50 ThinQ also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a way larger aperture to take better images in low light environments and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG V50 ThinQ features superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.