Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto Z3 Play, with an 83.7 score against 76.3. LG V50 ThinQ's design is newer than the Moto Z3 Play's, but it's thicker and heavier. LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little larger screen, a better screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have a camera with a 12 MP and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos.
LG V50 ThinQ features superior battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.