Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora black | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 general score. The Motorola One 5G construction is newer than LG V50 ThinQ's, although it is somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a better pixels quantity per inch of display. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola One 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Motorola One 5G features a superior camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V50 ThinQ. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the LG V50 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.