Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aurora black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LTPS |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, with an 83.7 score against 81.6. The LG V50 ThinQ design is somewhat thinner and lighter than Motorola One 5G Ace, although it was released just 21 months before. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One 5G Ace has greater battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola One 5G Ace features a little bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photos or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG V50 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.