Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Motorola One Action, getting a global score of 83.7 against 78.5. Although the LG V50 ThinQ and Motorola One Action were released only 3 months apart, the LG V50 ThinQ design is a bit thinner but a little bit heavier. LG V50 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Action, because it has a little more pixels per display inch, a little bit larger display and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video definition and the same resolution back-facing camera, the LG V50 ThinQ also has faster video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low light environments.
LG V50 ThinQ has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One Action, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ has just a little better battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V50 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.