Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora black | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, getting a general score of 83.7 against 79.8. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. Even though LG V50 ThinQ and the Motorola One Hyper were released with only a few months difference, LG V50 ThinQ is a little thinner and a bit lighter.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
Motorola One Hyper shoots better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate and a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola One Hyper's battery life is just as good as the battery performance in LG V50 ThinQ.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG V50 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.