Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora black | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola One Vision's global score of 80.7. The LG V50 ThinQ design is just a little thinner but a bit heavier than the Motorola One Vision, and both of them were released only a couple of months apart. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Vision, because it has a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a little bit larger screen and a little bit greater screen pixels density. The LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola One Vision counts with a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a back camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 14 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.