Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| OLED | LTPO |
| 537 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 global score. These phones come with Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
LG V50 ThinQ features an incredibly better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features improved battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has an 18 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.