Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Aurora black | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | -- |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Nokia XR20's overall score of 80.8. LG V50 ThinQ's design is extremely thinner and noticeably lighter than Nokia XR20, although it was released 2 years before. These phones have Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Nokia XR20 has Android 11.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than Nokia XR20. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia XR20, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Nokia XR20 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing photos or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back and a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Nokia XR20 counts with a bit better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 16% greater battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.