Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora black | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a general score of 83.7 against 75.8. Although the LG V50 ThinQ and the nubia Red Magic 3S were released with only 5 months difference, the LG V50 ThinQ is lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better performance than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ features a slightly better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3S has superior battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG V50 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.