Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora black | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, having a overall score of 83.7 against 77.7. Despite being the best phone we are comparing here, LG V50 ThinQ's body is older, just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Neo. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 operating system.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. OPPO Find X2 Neo and LG V50 ThinQ feature similar screens, because although the OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little lower pixel quantity in each display inch and a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little larger display.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures.
LG V50 ThinQ has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X2 Neo's battery life is just as good as LG V50 ThinQ's battery duration, although the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a 1 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.