Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora black | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, with an 83.7 score against 83.1. These phones come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. The LG V50 ThinQ is an older phone than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but LG was able to make it somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a bit larger screen. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and videos and a lot higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.