Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora black | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's score of 76. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11 version. LG V50 ThinQ's design is a bit lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it is just a little bit thicker and was released 2 years before.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit better screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse pixel density and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bit larger display. LG V50 ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a little faster processor than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Neo features just a bit better battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a superior camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a way higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.