Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | -- |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Aurora black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 overall score. The LG V50 ThinQ is a a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G and LG V50 ThinQ have incredibly similar screens, because although the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite worse pixel count in each screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in low-light environments and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much better storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.