Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, getting an 83.7 score against 82.1. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, even though it was released 3 years before. These phones include Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has Android 12.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per display inch and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G captures just a bit better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A13 5G features greater battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.