Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora black | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A15 5G's score of 77.4. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14. The LG V50 ThinQ is a a little bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A15 5G, but both of them are 0.33inches thick.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and more pixels per screen inch. LG V50 ThinQ counts with an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 50 MP resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ has a better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A15 5G has improved battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ costs more than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.