Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A20s's score of 77. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A20s has Android 11 version. LG V50 ThinQ is a a little bit thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy A20s, but both weight 6.46oz.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A20s, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A20s's battery life is just as good as the battery duration in LG V50 ThinQ. The LG V50 ThinQ captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a less megapixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.