Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy A21s's 77.7 score. The LG V50 ThinQ is an older cellphone than Galaxy A21s, but LG managed to build it just a little thinner and a little bit lighter anyway. These phones have the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better display than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a way higher pixels density. LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A21s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A21s takes slightly better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A21s also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back camera with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A21s features longer battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.