Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is better than Galaxy A22, with a global score of 83.7 against 76.1. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12. LG V50 ThinQ's body has the same thickness than Galaxy A22, but it's a little lighter. The LG V50 ThinQ features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a much better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a way less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture for better low light images and videos.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.