Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Aurora black | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has a score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 overall score. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but Galaxy A22 5G has newer 11 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10, so it provides a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy A22 5G is a newer phone than LG V50 ThinQ, although it's just a little thicker and a little bit heavier.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a greater pixel number per inch of screen. The LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features just a bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has improved battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.