Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G, getting a overall score of 83.7 against 79.9. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. The LG V50 ThinQ is a a little bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A25 5G, but they are equally thin.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a screen that is just as good as the LG V50 ThinQ one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a lot worse pixels density and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little larger display. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better performing CPU than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality photographs and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A25 5G counts with greater battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.