Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy A32 LTE Only's 82 score. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11. The LG V50 ThinQ construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, but it is noticeably heavier.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a display that is just as good as the LG V50 ThinQ one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, they both have a display with the same size.
LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a slightly better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates, a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos and a lot tinier back camera sensor shooting lot worse quality pictures and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.