Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G, with an 83.7 score against 79.4. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version. The LG V50 ThinQ is a noticeably older and a little thicker cellphone than Galaxy A35 5G, but LG managed to build it somewhat lighter anyway.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much powerful processor than Galaxy A35 5G. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy A35 5G features a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has longer battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.