Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Aurora black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A41, having a score of 83.7 against 81.7. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version. Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better phone than Samsung Galaxy A41, we must highlight that it's also an older, heavier and just a bit thicker phone.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A41, because it has a quite bigger screen, a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a little bit better screen pixel density. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A41 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way tinier aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A41, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory. The LG V50 ThinQ has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.