Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, having an 83.8 score against 83.7. The Galaxy A50 is a a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than the LG V50 ThinQ, even though both of them were only released with a few months difference. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A50 and LG V50 ThinQ both feature really similar battery durations.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.