Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is a little bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, with an 86.6 score against 83.7. Galaxy A50s's design is a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the LG V50 ThinQ, even though both were only released with a few months difference. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS. LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A50s. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
LG V50 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a better pixels number per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy A50s have incredibly similar batteries performance. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a lot smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.