Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora black | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 general score. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a newer cellphone than LG V50 ThinQ, but it is a little heavier and a little thicker.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V50 ThinQ has a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or videos in low light environments and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a little better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy A51 5G costs more money than the LG V50 ThinQ, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.