Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, getting a 90.7 score against 83.7. The Galaxy A52 design has the same thickness than LG V50 ThinQ, but it's a bit heavier. LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ features more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A52, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy A52 has a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much better 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a bit better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.