Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is slightly better than the LG V50 ThinQ's global score of 83.7. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10. Galaxy A52 5G is a a little heavier cellphone than LG V50 ThinQ, but both of them are equally thin.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. LG V50 ThinQ features a greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy A52 5G takes better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.