Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is a little bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, with a general score of 91.1 against 83.7. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A52s has 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, giving a lot of extra features and some performance improvements. The Galaxy A52s is a a little bit heavier device than LG V50 ThinQ, but both have the same thickness.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG V50 ThinQ features a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A52s. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy A52s has just a bit better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A52s has a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.