Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is better than Galaxy A6's score of 75.8. The LG V50 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than the Galaxy A6, although it's a little bit thicker and heavier. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a greater performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a bit larger display, a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a lot higher display pixel density. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A6, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ features improved battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has a 33 percent more battery size. The LG V50 ThinQ takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a back camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a bigger camera aperture and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. If you want to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.