Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70, getting an 83.7 score against 76.9. Both of these devices use the same Android 10 OS, so they should count with the same OS features. LG V50 ThinQ's design has the same weight than Samsung Galaxy A70, but it's a little bit thicker. The LG V50 ThinQ features just a little better performance than Galaxy A70. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and more pixels per inch in the display. LG V50 ThinQ features a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V50 ThinQ also has better video frame rate, a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a larger aperture to take better images and video in low light environments.
LG V50 ThinQ features much more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a little longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.