Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-10 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy C5, with an 83.7 score against 76.4. LG V50 ThinQ is a notably newer cellphone than Galaxy C5, but it is much thicker and incredibly heavier. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
LG V50 ThinQ features a superior processor than Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy C5, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a larger screen and a higher pixels density.
LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy C5, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior camera than Galaxy C5, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture and a way better (4K) video quality.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy C5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.