Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-10 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora black | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy C7, with an 83.7 score against 77.7. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although LG V50 ThinQ is noticeably newer than the Galaxy C7, it is somewhat thicker and a bit heavier.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy C7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better display than Galaxy C7, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a quite bigger screen and a greater pixel density.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy C7, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a 21% larger battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy C7, because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.