Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora black | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy C7 Pro's 78.4 global score. The LG V50 ThinQ is a incredibly newer phone than Galaxy C7 Pro, although it's thicker and just a little bit heavier. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
LG V50 ThinQ features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a greater pixels number in each inch of display and a much higher 1440 x 3120px resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ captures better photos and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a back camera with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a way larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and video. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.