Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F23 has a score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 score. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has the newer 12 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10, giving you some additional features and increased performance. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy F23, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light captures. The Samsung Galaxy F23 features greater battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.