Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aurora black | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has a global score of 85.2, which is slightly better than LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 global score. Even though the Galaxy F41 is newer than the LG V50 ThinQ, it is a little thicker and just a little heavier. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F41 has the newer 11 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple additional features.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little better performance than Galaxy F41. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater display pixel density and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy F41 shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a much better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.