Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is a bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ, getting an 88.1 score against 83.7. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10, giving a lot of extra features and some performance improvements. Galaxy F62's construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the LG V50 ThinQ.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 4 more cores. LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a greater pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a way larger sensor and a back-facing camera with a way better 64 MP resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much longer battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 75 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.