Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Aurora black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is just a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, with a 90.8 score against 83.7. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a just a little heavier phone than the LG V50 ThinQ, but they are 0.33inches thick. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a better pixel density.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better processing power than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 takes slightly better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much better video definition and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little better battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V50 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy LG V50 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.